Saturday, April 30, 2011

Buying a Camera & lenses ($700-$800 budget)

As of late, I've been asked several times, "What camera should I buy?" So I figured I should write a series of blog posts on "What camera you should buy?" Let me preface...I use Nikon's and will recommend them in this post because I feel they are much more user friendly than the other major brand. I have no scientific data to show that Nikons are more user friendly...perhaps it's just the way my brain is wired...and if you like me or you are like me, then your brain is probably wired similarly.

So...you have $700-$800 to use on a camera (& lenses)...I'm assuming you are a somewhat serious hobbyist and you already know how to shoot a camera...or you're going to learn how to shoot manually. If that's you, check out the Nikon D3100. I checked out some specs...lower noise at high ISO settings...big preview screen...14.2 megapixels...11 focal points...video...autofocus video! Some of the specs on this camera are better than the semi-pro D300! If you're shooting HDR...there's no auto bracketing...and if you don't know what HDR is...then who cares! You'll have to use those AF-S lenses, which cost a bit more than the standard AF lenses. If you have older AF lenses, then you might want to look at another camera.

The D3100 doesn't seem to be sold as body only. If you can find it as body only...I suggest purchasing it like so...and then getting your own lenses. Traditionally, this camera comes with the 18-55mm 3.5-5.6 zoom lens and the 55-200mm 3.5-5.6 lens...both are Vibration Reduction...meaning your pictures will be a bit less blurry when you're shooting at slower shutter speeds (it'll help reduce your hand shakiness...or just lay off the coffee)! I don't care for these 2 lenses because of multiple reasons. One main reason is because of the confusion it can create for those who are just learning about aperture. You may be puzzled when you set your aperture at 3.5...and then when you zoom in, it's at 5.6...and you can't bring it back down to 3.5...and so you're forced to change your shutter speed or ISO...or shoot super wide. There's an explanation for this...it can be confusing to explain...but it has to do with zooming in...losing light...and so therefore it's acting like it's at 5.6 rather than 3.5. These are not a pro lenses...or even semi pro...and that's why these lenses are rather inexpensive...and not always convenient.

I suggest purchasing the rumored 50mm 1.8 AF-S lens (if it actually comes out)...or it's more expensive brother, 50mm 1.4 AF-S. I also dig the 35mm 1.8 AF-S. If you need something wide...or a wide zoom that will keep it's aperture in place (a pro lens), then you'll need to save some $...or save a little bit of money and purchase a Sigma or Tamron. I prefer to buy Nikon lenses simply b/c they are more consistent in production. Some Sigma & Tamron lenses are awesome...but you are more likely to buy a lemon...I know from experience!

Also, check out the D5000, a used D80, or a used D200. The D80 & D200 will be in the same price range...and you'll be able to use those AF lenses. Issue is you will be buying a used camera...you won't have video...and your ISO performance will be compromised! (The D200 will be have some settings that are much easier to access!)

If you don't know what ISO is...it's a setting that makes your camera sensor more or less sensitive to light. Hence, if you are shooting at ISO 200, you're probably shooting outside in daylight. If you are shooting ISO 2000, then I hope you are inside...or it's dark outside! The drawback to higher ISO ratings is that your images may have more noise. The D80 & D200 will get more noisy quicker than the D3100...if that makes sense...?

Update: My good friend & trusty assistant back in Florida reminded me of the mighty D90! If you have an extra couple hundred dollars to spare (purchase used), I'd jump on this fine camera-ware. It's ISO capabilities are similar to it's older brother, the D300...but unlike the D300, it has video! It's body is similar to the D80, so the D200 (& D300) have some easy access buttons. But for the price and performance, this is one tough camera!

Hope that helps...next "What camera should I buy?" will be for those on a much stricter budget...here's a pic to hold you through...enjoy!

5 comments:

j said...

What about the D90? haha... You can get a used D90 for around $600 now. And it uses the older non-AFS lenses. Or splurge and get the awesome d7000. Around $1000 used though...but it's noise reduction is similar to the d700. Ezra, you should consider the D7000 too. I'd consider it an upgrade from the D300 in my opinion.

Unknown said...

In due season I'll skip to the D700...and yes, the D90...forgot about that one...

Unknown said...

Hey Ezra - I'm curious about your recommendation to buy a 50mm lens instead of the stock lens.

I am new to photography, am looking to buy my first DSLR (Canon 60D), and am deciding which lens to buy. I understand all the benefits of a prime lens and the difference between the kit lens (which has a 3.5-5.6 aperture, much like the Nikon kit lens), but here is my question:

Is a 50mm wide enough if I have just one lens? AS I test at 50mm out on a cropped sensor lens, the field of view is a bit narrow for anything indoors.

What's your take?

Unknown said...

Yes sir...the 50mm is not a wide angle lens...it's a standard lens. I tote a 24mm, 35mm, & a 50mm lens...I rather do that than purchase a 17-55 2.8 (which I have a had before). It's narrow for indoors...well, sort of. I shoot events and I live off of my 50mm and 35mm lenses. I guess it depends on how you shoot. One of the cool things about the 50mm is that if you shoot it between f/1.8-2.0, you are getting the closest thing to how your eyes actually see!

Check here - http://ezramarcos.blogspot.com/search/label/Charitable - most of these shots are with a 50mm or 35mm...

Hope that helps!

Anonymous said...

It does help! Thanks Ezra. ;)